Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:19

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Webb telescope took a direct image of two exoplanets. See it now. - Mashable
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Jessica Alba sunbathes in tiny bikini while ‘channeling chill’ on wellness getaway - Page Six
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why aren't you a Trump supporter?
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why should we share our wife with others?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.